Monday, January 31, 2011

Q-15

What is so con-demn-ocratic about Rahul Gandhi saying that incidents such as those of Nanded (burning alive of Additional Collector, Yashwant Sonawane) should not be repeated ?

a)  BOFORS was never repeated; FODDER was never repeated; CHURHAT was never repeated;
     ADARSH will never be repeated; COMMONWEALTH will never be repeated; 2G will never 
     be repeated

b)  Crime is like a dynasty. Faces change

c)  Honesty should never be repeated

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Q-14

What is so con-demn-ocratic about the Maharashtra Government arresting 200 people connected with kerosene adulteration racket, within hours of the tragedy of Additional Collector Yashwant Sonawane being burnt alive?

a)  Police custody & Government protection will ensure that they are kept away from the potential
     wrath of angry mobs & potential disclosures to the media

b)  Only if they are on its payrolls or if it is on their payrolls, would it have been possible to be in  
     possession of the names, addressess & whereabouts for such an immediate action

c)  For all his honesty, Yashwant Sonawane was a square peg in a hole where cricket is
     adulterated with politics, politics is adulterated with crime, crime is adulterated with
     business & business is adulterated with cricket

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Q-13

What is so con-demn-ocratic about Sonia Gandhi asking Congress Ministers to give up discretionary powers?

a)  It is akin to expecting carnivorous animals to subsist on grass & leaves

b)  Can she give up Quattrochi to the CBI?

c)  Can the Central Government give up control over the CBI and allow it to function in a fair
     and just way?

Monday, January 3, 2011

Q-12

What is so con-demn-ocratic about the report by Central Building Research Institute (CBRI) that says flats at the 2010 Commonwealth Games Village, each sold for Rs 2 crores, are so shoddily built that their life span may not be more than 20 years ?

a)   It should not have taken a CBRI report for us to believe. The fact that Kalmadi or any of his  
     Organising-Committee colleagues or officials of DDA or the Chief Minister of Delhi or her 
     ministerial colleagues or for that matter former Chief Minister of Maharashtra Ashok
     Chavan or his relatives or senior officials of Army etc do not own any of those flats, should 
     have raised our suspicions

b)  CBI may refuse to lay its hands on this case since all evidence stands to collapse & get
     destroyed after 20 years, thereby hampering its investigations further into it

c)  We are unnecessarily being cynical. Should we expect the Taj Mahal in Rs 2 crores, that can 
     stand the ravages of time? 20 years is good enough life-span. There are flyovers and bridges 
     that have collapsed while under construction

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Q-11

What is so con-demn-ocratic about the conviction in a trial court of Dr Binayak Sen?

a)  We are dealing with naxalism by 'trial' & 'error'

b)  If all those voicing their opinion against the judgement are India's intellectuals, does it mean
     that those who have delivered the judgement lack intellect?

c)  Had this verdict happened in China, Dr Sen would have been conferred the Nobel Peace Prize

Saturday, January 1, 2011

Q-10

What is so con-demn-ocratic about CBI's closure of the Arushi murder case?

a)  There is no clarity whether CBI is ruthless or toothless....or is it toothlessly ruthless....or is it
      ruthlessly toothless......so confusing!

b)  There is hope for Kalmadi and Raja.......... 

c)  In India, 'Crime is.. because hope is..'